![]() |
WE MOVE 204 West 84th Street New York, NY 10024 E-mail: wemove@wemove.org wemove.org • mdvu.org |
|
|
DiagnosisThe diagnostic evaluation of dystonia may include the following:
For example, the presence of hemidystoniaor rest dystonia rather than action dystonia at symptom onsetis strongly suggestive of secondary dystonia. Identification of certain features may suggest that symptoms have an emotional rather than an organic origin [psychogenic disease], such as abrupt onset, changing characteristics over time, spontaneous remissions, etc. And early limb-onset dystonia in the absence of other findings may suggest primary dystonia possibly due to DYT1 gene mutation [Oppenheim dystonia].) During clinical evaluation to assess the nature of the dystonia, patients may be examined and videotaped while performing various actions, such as sitting, standing, lying down, or walking. In addition, if the dystonia is not always present, the examiner may use various methods to help "trigger" dystonic spasms to aid in diagnosis, such as requesting that a patient with suspected blepharospasm repeatedly open and shut his or her eyes. The examiner may also conduct passive movements of the affected bodily region, carefully feel (palpate) contracting muscles, and/or request that a patient adapt various positions or postures with the affected area. Such methods may be necessary for accurate diagnosis, appropriate assessment of the nature of dystonia, and localization of involved muscles (e.g., for those who may be appropriate candidates for therapy with botulinum toxin). Such evaluation may be documented by videotaped recordings. For those patients with suspected laryngeal dystonia, voice assessment is typically documented on voice recordings. Additional evaluations may include assessment by a speech-language pathologists, when appropriate, physical or occupational therapists, or genetic counselors.
According to experts, individuals with early-onset apparently isolated dystonia should undergo specific tests to help exclude Wilson disease (e.g., slit lamp examination, serum ceruloplasmin). If patient and family history and physical examination reveal certain symptoms, signs, and physical findings suggestive of secondary or heredodegenerative dystonias, more extensive diagnostic testing may be recommended, such as enzymatic studies (assays), neuroimaging studies, etc. For those with primary dystonias, dystonia is typically the only sign upon examination (i.e., with the possible exception of tremor or brief myoclonic jerks). In such cases, most diagnostic studies may not provide any revealing findings. However, for individuals with early-onset or limb-onset dystonia, regardless of their family history or ancestry (i.e., whether of Ashkenazi Jewish or non-Jewish descent), DNA testing is now available to help confirm or exclude primary dystonia due to mutation of the DYT1 gene. During such testing, blood samples are taken from patients and DNA is directly analyzed for the presence of the GAG (guanine, adenine, guanine) deletion in the DYT1 gene's coded instructions. In addition to confirming or ruling out DYT1 dystonia in patients with symptoms, such testing may also help to detect or exclude the DYT1 gene mutation in family members of diagnosed individuals and may be conducted prenatally. As mentioned earlier, however, evidence indicates that only 30 to 40 percent of those who carry a mutated DYT1 gene for the disease manifest symptoms (reduced penetrance). Therefore, a majority of those with the mutated gene do not develop the disorder. There currently is no way to predict whether an individual with the disease gene will develop dystonia. Because the disorder has reduced penetrance as well as variable expressivity among those who do develop symptoms, experts recommend that genetic counseling should be provided for individuals who are considering diagnostic, carrier, or prenatal DYT1 DNA testing. For patients with early-onset generalized or segmental limb dystonia who test negative for the DYT1 gene mutation, physicians may recommend a diagnostic trial with the agent levodopa (L-dopa). The dystonia-plus syndrome known as dopamine-responsive dystonia (DRD) is suggested in young patients with dystonia who have significant improvement with low-dose L-dopa therapy. In contrast, most dystonia patients who do not have DRD do not have a response to treatment with L-dopa or dopamine agonists. Thus, if no improvement is noted after approximately 3 months of L-dopa therapy, a diagnosis of DRD is considered unlikely and such treatment may be stopped. For some patients with adult-onset focal dystonias that are presumed to be primarye.g., based upon thorough clinical examination, a complete patient and family history, nature of the dystonia, absence of certain signs upon examination, etc.experts indicate that extensive laboratory or neuroimaging studies may not be necessary. As discussed above, if patients are under 40 years of age, they should receive specific tests to help exclude Wilson disease. In addition, the presence of certain unusual (atypical) signs may suggest the need for additional testing. For example, as mentioned previously, adult-onset lower limb dystonia is extremely rare; therefore, such patients should receive diagnostic evaluations to determine whether the condition has occurred secondary to Parkinson's disease or other parkinsonism syndromes. However, individuals with typical adult-onset focal dystonias, particularly those who have been affected for several months or more, may not require further diagnostic evaluations unless new signs or unusual symptoms develop. It is possible that DNA analysis may assist in diagnosing other forms of dystonia caused by known mutations of specific genes in certain families. However, such testing may be considered investigational and/or may not be widely available. As more is learned about the genetic causes of the different forms of dystonia, it is hoped that such information will lead to additional laboratory studies and greater availability of such testing to help confirm the diagnoses.
|
||||||